Legal Opinion · Dissent

Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2011Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

I tend toward the majority’s position that — to the degree the Department has established valid legislative regulations— such regulations should establish the primary frame of reference in these cases. I also believe that the Department should be active in promulgating reasonable regulations to provide essential guidance. In this regard, common-law fixtures analysis seems to me to entail too great a degree of uncertainty to govern for tax-classification purposes. See, e.g., Strain v. Green, 25 Wash.2d 692, 172 P.2d 216, 218 (1946) (Robinson, J.) (commenting that “[ejvery lawyer knows that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strain v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API