Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Madison v. Kolbeck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The defendants make a very logical and forceful argument that the note, the payment of which was secured by a mortgage, having run for more than six years after maturity, no cause of action can be maintained upon it and that the mortgage given to secure it has no existence, its existence being dependent upon the life of the indebtedness secured by it. It is a rule of law in this state that the running of the statute extinguishes the right and creates another right in the debtor of eqqal dignity and that the obligation is thereby extinguished as completely as if it had been paid or otherwise…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Brown v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hayes v. FreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Doyon & Rayne Lumber Co. v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Klemer v. City RecorderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Haase v. SawickiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cunningham v. DavidoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Bazan v. Kux MacHine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United Central Bank v. Wells Street Apartments, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013
  5. Herrell v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API