Legal Opinion

Barker v. Freeman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1890No. 13506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

This case originated in a contest instituted in the state land-office by an application of the plaintiff, in 1888, to purchase a tract of swamp and overflowed land, of which defendant, upon an application in due form, obtained in 1871 a certificate of purchase from the register of the state land-office. The contest was duly referred to the proper court for adjudication. Plaintiff filed his complaint. Defendant demurred to it, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and *534judgment entered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowell v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Yoakum v. BrowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Koster v. Local No. 33 International Alliance Theatrical Stage EmployeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API