Maddalena v. Brand
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
The plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court seeking to compel the defendants to remove a boathouse allegedly constructed in violation of certain restrictions contained in the deed to the defendants’ nominee. The trial judge found for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal from a judgment ordering the removal of the boathouse.
In determining whether the building of a boathouse violates the restrictions, we have to ascertain the intent of the parties in light of the circumstances. Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 248 Mass. 378, 383 (1924). Bessey v. Ollman, 242 Mass. 89,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jeffries v. JeffriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Bessey v. OllmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Parsons v. DuryeaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Fall River Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Weston Forest & Trail Ass'n v. FishmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Well-Built Homes, Inc. v. ShusterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Chatham Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. FarberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Kline v. Shearwater Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.