Legal Opinion

Maddalena v. Brand

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 26, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court seeking to compel the defendants to remove a boathouse allegedly constructed in violation of certain restrictions contained in the deed to the defendants’ nominee. The trial judge found for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal from a judgment ordering the removal of the boathouse.

In determining whether the building of a boathouse violates the restrictions, we have to ascertain the intent of the parties in light of the circumstances. Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 248 Mass. 378, 383 (1924). Bessey v. Ollman, 242 Mass. 89,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. JeffriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Bessey v. OllmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Allen v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Parsons v. DuryeaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Fall River Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Weston Forest & Trail Ass'n v. FishmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Well-Built Homes, Inc. v. ShusterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Chatham Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. FarberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Kline v. Shearwater Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API