Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 2011No. 26966Published

1Opinion of the Court

392 S.C. 340 (2011)

709 S.E.2d 54

Nancy S. AHRENS, Ann Mercer, and Gary M. McCombs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents/Appellants,

v.

The STATE of South Carolina and the South Carolina Retirement System, Appellants/Respondents. and

James B. Arnold, Jr., Cynthia A. Thompkins-Hart, Nelson E. Brown, William M. Tisdale, Jr., Bobby Pack, Mitch Anderson, Lorenza Cobb, Ivan Holden, Phillip White, Jamie Harrelson, Dan Furr, Ann U. Mercer, Sharon C. Fulton, Johnnie R. Deas, Katie Daniels and Barbara Durfey, Panda J. Duncan, Janet Klee, John Locklair, Carol Ann Williamson…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. HarbinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API