Legal Opinion

Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1939No. 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Judge.

A rehearing was granted in this case in order that further consideration might be given to one of the points involved in the main issue that is presented. Stated in the form of a question, the point is: Does the rule of law which affords protection to the purchaser of property dealing on the faith of the public records apply in a case where the purchaser’s title grows out of a sale under mortgage and it is shown that the mortgagor himself was not in possession of the property at the time he granted the mortgage? In this case the inquiry on the question of possession may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. PizanieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Davis v. Greve & WildermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. Foster's Heirs v. Foster's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
  4. Dreyfous v. ChildsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  5. Stockton v. CraddickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API