Legal Opinion
Jacklich v. Baer
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1943No. Civ. 6717PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for an accounting under the terms of a written contract.
On November 22, 1930, plaintiffs Prank Jacklich and An thony Jacklich, as parties of the first part, entered into a contract with defendant Max Baer as party of the second part, wherein first parties agreed to pay Baer $5,000 upon the execution of the contract, an additional $5,000 within thirty days, and $5,000 three years from date. Said contract recited that Baer had on October 6, 1930, entered into an agreement with H. Lorimer and Ancil Hoffman by which he had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Marks v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Weeks v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
- Moore v. HeronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- In Re Chicago Reed & Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Beatty Safway Scaffold, Inc. v. SkrableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- MacKay v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.