Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2012No. 2011AP2448-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Michael J. Hicks, regarding Attorney Hicks' professional misconduct in the handling of three client matters. The OLR and Attorney Hicks stipulate that Attorney Hicks committed professional misconduct in his handling of the matters and that he should be publicly reprimanded for his misconduct. The OLR is not seeking costs. Upon careful consideration, we adopt the stipulated facts and impose a public reprimand.

¶ 2. Attorney Hicks was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1984 and practices in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tiffany T. LutherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tiffany T. LutherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API