Legal Opinion

Hearne v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 27, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02020Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RACHEL H.,1 Case No. 3:18-cv-02020-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Rachel H. (“Plaintiff”) brings this appeal challenging the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The Court has jurisdiction to hear Plaintiff’s appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), which incorporates the review provisions…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API