Legal Opinion

Novadaq Technologies, Inc. v. Karl Storz GmbH & Co. K.G.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 10, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-04853-PSGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*950ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge

Product launches are all about creating excitement. Excitement for a product. Excitement for the product’s manufacturer. Excitement for the product’s anticipated customers. But not everyone is excited, especially a trademark owner that believes the launched product infringes that trademark. This dispute offers one such example.

Plaintiff Novadaq Technologies, Inc. specializes in medical imaging products that use its SPY-trademarked fluorescence imaging technology.1 Defendants Karl Storz GmbH & Co.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Skunk IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  2. Gemini Data, Inc. v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API