Legal Opinion

State v. Elam

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1978No. B45-113, CA 11103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.

Defendant was charged by complaint with two counts of menacing. ORS 163.190. The court denied his motion to sever the charges for trial. A jury found him guilty on one count, but not guilty on the other. He appeals, arguing that his motion to sever should have been granted, that the court erred in sustaining the state’s objection to a question asked a juror on voir dire and that two requested instructions should have been given.

On the day before the alleged criminal incident, defendant, the woman with whom he lived and her 10-year-old daughter went on a picnic. Defendant’s clothing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. ShieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walls v. City of PetersburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. LinthwaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. ArmentaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API