Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Ace Brunk

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2019No. 2:14-cv-01277Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:14-cv-01277-MCE-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 ACE BRUNK; and Does 1-10; 15 Defendants. 16 17 Through this suit, Plaintiff Scott Johnson sought damages and injunctive relief 18 against Defendant Ace Brunk (“Defendant”) for violations of the Americans with 19 Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213, as well as California’s Unruh Civil 20 Rights Act,

Cal. Civ. Code § 51

(“Unruh Act”), and Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code 21 § 54 – 54.8 (“Disabled Persons Act”).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. McCown v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Ruff v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API