Legal Opinion

Hollis v. City of Buffalo

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1999No. 94-CV-539(H)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(e), the parties consented to have the undersigned conduct any and all further proceedings in this case including entry of final judgment (Item 23). Plaintiff commenced this action alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l), § 296 of the New York Human Rights Law, and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. A bench trial was held and the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. On December 30, 1998,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Potamkin Cadillac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Karg Bros.District Court, N.D. New York · 1993
  4. United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Dow Chemical Pacific Ltd. v. Rascator Maritime S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whittingham v. Amherst CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  2. Dow Chemical Co. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Draim v. Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Greg Canerdy v. Don MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  5. Saint v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API