Legal Opinion

In re Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals by Charles F. Murphy and William B. Carswell from parts of an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 10th day of December, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

At the election held on November 3, 1914, the canvass of the votes cast for the office of Senator for the sixth senatorial district of the State of New York indicated that William B. Cars-well had received 12,867 votes and that ■ Charles F. Murphy had received 12,845 votes. This gave to Carswell an apparent majority of 22. Thereafter, pursuant to the provisions of sec*309tion 381 of the Election Law (Consol. Laws, chap. IT [Laws of 1909, chap. 22], as amd. by Laws of 1913, chap. 821), the relator applied for a judicial investigation of all ballots cast at said election which were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nichols v. Board of County CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Matter of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. People Ex Rel. Davies v. CowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. People Ex Rel. Goring v. President & Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. People ex rel. Deitz v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aura v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API