Wirges v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of marihuana; punishment was assessed at ten years’ imprisonment; adult probation was granted by the court.
The appellant waived prosecution by indictment and consented to be charged by information. The date of the offense was June 6, 1974.
We have examined-the information and find it to be fundamentally defective for failure to allege the amount of marihuana delivered. Mears and Willis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 520 S.W.2d 380 (1975); Wilson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 520 S.W.2d 377 (1975). With regard to amount, the information states only that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Mears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Suarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Tribble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Finley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.