Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Peketz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 26, 1935No. 13,492PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

The plaintiff in error, Chandler, as receiver of Diamond Motor Parts Company, an insolvent Minnesota corporation, sued in the district court of Denver to recover from the defendant in error, Peketz — as in Chandler v. Manifold, 92 Colo. 579, 22 P. (2d) 870, the same receiver had similarly sued to recover from one Manifold — an assessment alleged to be due by reason of being a stockholder in that company. The Constitution of Minnesota, article 10, section 3, provides that, “Each stockholder in any corporation, excepting those organized for the purpose of carrying on any kind of manufacturing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Marin v. AugedahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Chandler v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chandler v. PeketzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API