Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1932No. 24006. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted by the receiver of the Diamond Motor Parts Company, a corporation of the state of Minnesota, to enforce a stock holder’s liability under the constitution and laws of the state of Minnesota. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal, rendered upon the plaintiff’s refusal to plead further after a demurrer had been sustained to the complaint.

The facts disclosed by the complaint are summarized as follows:

The Diamond Motor Parts Company was incorporated under the laws of Minnesota. Alleging the insolvency of the corporation, an action was commenced in the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. McCabe Brothers Co. v. Farmers Grain Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. SatterwhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bates v. CooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Chandler v. ManifoldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Chandler v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Chandler v. PeketzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API