Legal Opinion

Obrecht v. Pujos

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing on the original appeal and affirming on the cross-appeal.

This appeal involves the validity of the first and third clauses of the following will:

“Trappist Monastery. Jan. 9, 1918.
“My last will and testament in-case of sudden death before the end of my novitiate in the order of Reformed Cistercians.
“To the authority of the Monastery.
“It is my last will and testament that the following sums be applied as follows out of the fund brought and left by me to the Rev. Father Abbot:
“1st. Three hundred dollars ($300.00) to be applied for masses to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. SchoulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Coleman, &c. v. O'Leary's Exr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Curling's Administrators v. Curling's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  4. Ford v. Ford's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  5. Tichenor v. Brewer'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kentucky Christian Missionary Society v. MorenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Owens v. Owens'Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Bush's v. MacKoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. In Re the Estate of WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Lightfoot v. LightfootCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API