Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Ward

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8640PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Appellant, the next of kin of the deceased, appeals from the decree of final distribution in the above-entitled estate.

By said decree the estate was distributed in accordance with the provisions of the will and codicils of the deceased. In the trial court appellant objected to such distribution on the ground that a provision of the second codicil, which was executed within thirty days of the death of the testator, was invalid under section 1313 of the Civil Code (now section 41 of the Probate Code). The provision of the codicil claimed to be invalid reads as follows:

“In ¿ddition to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Hoeffer v. CloganIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Estate of HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kavanaugh v. WattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clippinger v. BreartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Estate of HoltermannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Newman v. Roman Catholic BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API