Legal Opinion

United States v. Franklin National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 26, 1965No. 333, Docket 29374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

On November 16, 1964 the Franklin National Bank was served with a summons issued, pursuant to § 7602 and § 7603 of the Internal Revenue Code,1 *6by a special agent in the office of the District Director of Internal Revenue at Los Angeles. This summons was issued by the special agent in the course of his examination into the tax liability of Marvin R. Cole and his wife, Gladys Cole. It directed the Bank to appear and testify to certain matters relating to transactions with the taxpayers for the years 1955-1963 and to bring with it, for examination, “All credit files,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Grant Foster and Foster Construction C.A., Intervenors-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. Franklin National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. BenfordDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API