Legal Opinion
United States v. Benford
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 20, 1968No. Civ. No. 4807PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAMER, District Judge.
This is a proceeding under Title 26 U.S.C. Section 7402 and 7604 to enforce summonses issued by an agent of the Internal Revenue Service. Mr. Fred T. Mackey, through his attorney, has filed a petition to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) which provides in part:
INTERVENTION OF RIGHT. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action * * (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clifford O. Boren, Delta M. Boren and Clifford O. Boren Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lloyd M. Tucker, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Albert J. Wild and Air Conditioning Supply Co., Inc. v. United States of America, Bennett Y. Brewer, and Valley National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Wilbur A. Sale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Justice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Antonio A. Diaz v. The Southern Drilling Corp., Also Known as South-Eastern Drilling Inc., Etal., and Trefina, A.G., Intervenor-Appellant. Great American Investment Company, Limited, Etc. v. W. P. Clements, Jr., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970