Legal Opinion

Holbert v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1986No. 83-1557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted, following a jury trial, of second-degree burglary, D.C.Code § 22-1801(b) (1981), and grand larceny, id. § 22-2201. The trial court later reduced the grand larceny conviction to petit larceny. On direct appeal, appellant argues that the mid-trial arrest of a defense wit ness violated appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process. He further contends that the trial court erred in excluding bias testimony appellant wished to elicit from this defense witness. Finally, appellant asserts the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Claude L. Smith, United States of America v. James P. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Jaggers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. James Trent Bray v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent, Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Deneal v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Irby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. GraysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API