Legal Opinion

Loughridge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1937No. A-9272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged by information in the district court of Oklahoma county with the crime of “obtaining money by means and use of a false and bogus check,” was tried and convicted and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the penitentiary, and from this judgment and sentence he has appealed.

The first error complained of by defendant is that the proof shows a case of forgery and not one of obtaining money by means of a bogus check, and that he should have been tried, if at all, for forgery, and not upon the other charge, and that for this reason the verdict of the jury is contrary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Sledge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API