Legal Opinion
Zucker v. Sable
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 9, 1976No. 74 Civ. 1086 (HFW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff suing for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated seeks to recover damages for alleged misstatements and omissions by the defendants in a press release that dealt with the development of soft contact lenses. This court has jurisdiction of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The defendants have moved to dismiss the amended complaint and for judgment on the pleadings.
The defendants assert that the complaint should be dismissed as insufficient as a matter of law for plaintiff’s failure…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,072 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Salwen Paper Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Elkind v. Liggett & Myers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Management Assistance Inc. v. EdelmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- United Brands Co. v. Intermediate Credit Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977