Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Boyd

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the Commonwealth) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion for reconsideration of sentence. The Commonwealth contends that the trial court erred in declining to impose the five year mandatory minimum sentence found in section 7508(a)(3)(ii) of the Crimes Code. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties). Particularly, the Commonwealth asserts that the trial court erred in relying on Commonwealth v. Shiffler, 583 Pa. 478, 879 A.2d 185 (2005), to conclude that section 7508(a)(3)(ii) reflects a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. LeveretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. Carpio-SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. v. Mayo, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Walker, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API