Legal Opinion

Jurman v. Sun Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about August 8, 1997, which granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification as moot, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree that plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, Octane Disclosure (15 USC §§ 2821-2824) in that the preemption clause (15 USC § 2824 [a]) bans any State “provision of law or regulation” that is not the same as the Federal provisions (see, Pennzoil Co. v Carlson, 158 AD2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guice v. Charles Schwab & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Pennzoil Co. v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. General Petroleum Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API