Legal Opinion

Guice v. Charles Schwab & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1996PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Levine, J.

The plaintiffs in these appeals are former retail customers of defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab) and Fidelity Brokerage Services, Inc. (Fidelity). Schwab and Fidelity are "discount” stock brokerage houses, operating nationwide, who charge reduced commissions for effecting securities transactions for their clientele and hold themselves out as offering quicker executions of orders on behalf of customers who have already decided upon what securities to buy or sell. Plaintiffs have brought these class actions on behalf of all similarly situated…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont SecuritiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. International Equity Investments, Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API