First National Bank v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This appeal calls into question the constitutionality of Act 66 of 1983, the Single Exise Tax statute,1 promulgated by the General Assembly as a direct result of this Court’s decision in Dale National Bank v. Commonwealth, 502 Pa. 170, 465 A.2d 965 (1983). That decision struck down as violative of federal law the method of computing the Bank Shares Tax2 which required the taxpayer to include obligations of the United States owned by the taxpayer in its total assets for the purpose of calculating net worth. The Single Exise Tax, a one-time tax upon all taxpayers which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oz Gas, Ltd. v. Warren Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cambridge State Bank v. RoemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Allfirst Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.