Legal Opinion

United States v. O'conner

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided January 2, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, District Judge.

In each of these cases the motion to quash the search warrant raises the question of the authority of a prohibition agent, duly appointed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to execute a search warrant. The question is not a new one. The following courts have upheld the authority: U. S. v. Daison *585(D. C.) 288 Fed. 199, and U. S. v. Keller (D. C.) 288 Fed. 204, both opinions by Judge Tuttle; U. S. v. Syrek (D. C.) 290 Fed. 820.

I should not feel that it is necessary to write on this subject, but for the recent able opinion of Judge Woodrough in U. S. v. Musgrave (D.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DaisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
  2. Smith v. GilliamDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1922
  3. United States v. MusgraveDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1923
  4. United States v. SyrekDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
  5. United States v. KellerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Raine v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Dovel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  4. Keehn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API