Legal Opinion

Platt v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1925No. 11684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

Action to recover of the City of Columbia the sum of $113.55, with interest, representing the amount of an assessment laid upon the abutting property of the plaintiff for street and sidewalk paving, under the Act of February 17, 1911, (27 Stat. 23), passed pursuant to a constitutional amendment ratified by Act of February 3, 1911 (27 Stat. 225), paid by the plaintiff under protest, and alleged by him .to have been illegally laid.

In this case, as in the case of Ballentine v. City of Columbia, 124 S. E., 643, recently decided by this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Jackson v. BreelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. Lucas v. Barringer, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Sullivan v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Ballentine v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Sutton v. Town of Fort MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Ballentine v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API