Legal Opinion

State v. Walsh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1990No. C2-90-289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s imposition of a more severe penalty after the state moved for resentencing based on an error in a sentencing worksheet. Because we do not read the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure to permit a post sentencing increase on these facts, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of the original sentence.

FACTS

Appellant, Brian Walsh was convicted of third degree criminal sexual conduct by his plea of guilty in Hennepin County District Court. As part of the negotiated plea the state recommended that Walsh receive the presumptive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Wilson v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State v. MontjoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. RockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BorregoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. VerdonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API