State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
We conclude that the relators are entitled to a writ of mandamus and therefore reverse the court of appeals.
The board contends that the agreement was in effect until the point of “ultimate impasse” in renegotiations, and that the agreement authorized the layoffs of the relators. The relators contend that the agreement was not in effect, having expired prior to their return to work on or after September 17, 1993. Thus, we must initially determine whether the provisions of the agreement governed the legal rights and responsibilities of the board and the relators during the relevant events…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ferdinand v. Hamilton Local Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Cleveland v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emp./AFSCME, Local 4, AFL-CIO v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Couch v. Trimble Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.