Legal Opinion
Parham v. Manson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 16, 1980No. Civ. A. H-78-361PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MAGISTRATE’S RECOMMENDED DECISION ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to the Court’s Rules for United States Magistrates, Rule 1(C)(3), petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was referred to Magistrate Eagan on July 12, 1978. Subsequently, on August 27, 1980, the Magistrate recommended that the petitioner’s judgment of conviction be vacated and that the writ be issued, unless the state superior court should grant the petitioner a new trial within one hundred twenty days.
' Petitioner, Isaac Parham, a prisoner at the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983
- Parham v. MansonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981