United States Fidelity Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
This Court must determine whether the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA) has authority to refuse to indemnify member insurers for unreasonable charges. In these consolidated appeals, the MCCA refused to indemnify its member insurers, United States Fidelity Insurance & Guaranty Company (USF&G) and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (Hartford) (together, plaintiffs), for personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits1 in excess of $250,000.2 The MCCA claimed that the hourly rates for attendant care services agreed to by plaintiffs were unreasonable and that it was not required…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- McIlravy v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Hartford Ins Co of the Midwest v. Mich Catastrophic Claims AssnMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.