Legal Opinion
Whirlpool Corp. v. King
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 4, 2003No. 1:02-cv-00649PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MCKEAGUE, District Judge.
On January 7, 2003, following a hearing, the Court issued an order denying plaintiffs motion to remand this case to state court. In the same order the Court took under advisement defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court ordered both parties to file supplemental briefs detailing the extent of defendant Susan King’s contacts with Michigan. The supplemental briefing has been completed and the Court now addresses the motion to dismiss without the benefit of further hearing.
I
The material…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Neogen Corporation v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FAURECIA EXHAUST SYSTEMS, INC. v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006