Legal Opinion

Byrd v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Criminal Law. Confessions. Accomplice. Evidence. Before Judge Harris. Campbell Superior Court. August Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

Byrd was charged with the offence of larceny from the house. On a trial he was found guilty by the jury. A motion for new trial was made, which was overruled, and he excepted. The grounds of the motion were:

(1.) The admission in evidence of certain acts and conduct of one Tom Betts, who was charged as an accomplice and principal in said offence.

(2.) The admission in evidence of certain confessions of Byrd, the accused, given in under the circumstances detailed in the record.

(3.) Exceptions to certain portions of the charge of the court as given to the jury on the trial.

*6621. Betts…

2Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lanier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Kolkman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API