Legal Opinion

Lanier v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1939No. 12630PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

“The testimony of a single witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact. Exceptions to this rule are made in specified cases; such as, to convict of treason or perjury, in any case of felony where the only witness is an accomplice, and to rebut a responsive statement in an answer in equity — in these cases (except in treason) corroborating circumstances may dispense with another witness.” Code, § 38-121. This court has construed that portion of this Code section relating to the necessity of connecting an accomplice in felony cases…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Birt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API