Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Sibeck

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Proceeding under what is generally known as Amendment No. 11, correctly designated as No. 8 in Applegate’s Constitution of Arkansas, and under the enabling act, 210 of 1925, the then county judge of Pulaski County took the necessary steps to issue bonds to- refund the county’s indebtedness existing on October 7, 1924, the supposed date of the adoption of said amendment. Subsequently this court held the amendment was adopted and became effective on December 7, 1924. Matheny v. Independence County, 169 Ark. 925, 277 S. W. 22. Thereafter, in July, 1925, the county court ascertained and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matheny v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Hagler v. Arkansas CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boatmen's Nat. Co. v. M. W. Elkins & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Dowell v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Lawrence County v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  5. Caskey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API