Legal Opinion · Dissent

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1907No. 20,855Published

From Porter Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge. Action by Fred O. Hamlin against the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $4,000, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Gillett, J.

I dissent. For present purposes it is unnecessary to consider the ultimate question of affirmance or reversal. My objection goes to the course of reasoning by which a reversal is reached. A word as to the evidence: The ear was moving at the rate of a slow walk, or, as otherwise stated, at a speed of about two miles an hour. The work was required to be done in haste. About one minute would have been lost if the car had been stopped to adjust the coupling. It would only have taken a second to open *38the knuckle, had it worked properly. There was expert testimony that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PritchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API