Legal Opinion
MacHeca Transport Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2011No. 10-1482PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Macheca Transport Company and David and Starlin Macheca (Macheca) sued Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (Philadelphia) seeking insurance coverage for damages resulting from a pipe rupture in Macheca’s refrigerated warehouse. After we reversed the original grant of summary judgment in favor of Philadelphia, see Macheca Transp. Co. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co., 463 F.3d 827 (8th Cir.2006) (Macheca I), the district court granted Philadelphia’s renewed motion for summary judgment on one of two coverage theories advanced by Macheca, and dismissed Macheca’s vexatious refusal…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Robin v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Dhyne v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stein v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- MacHela Transport Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. v. Adam SoczynskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- TAMKO Building Products, Inc. v. Factual Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- Jessica Syfco v. Encompass Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.