Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 24, 1998No. 96-8891PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant James Edward Mitchell appeals his conviction for bank robbery and the sentence the district court imposed upon him. Mitchell argues that the jury verdict cannot stand because the jury’s conviction of Mitchell on charges of armed bank robbery irreconcilably conflicts with its acquittal of Mitchell on charges of using a firearm during the commission of the bank robbery. Mitchell also contends that he was charged in a single count with violating both 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), but the jury was not provided with instructions that would enable it…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Amadou Fall NdiayeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. David ProutyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ivan CurbeloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.