Legal Opinion

Gray Construction Co. v. Hyde

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1926No. File No. 5282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

The plaintiff in this action was a creditor of the South Dakota Central Railway Company, and the defendants were stockholders in said company. The company became insolvent and unable to pay plaintiff’s claim, and plaintiff, claiming that defendant’s stock was not fully paid, brought this action to recover from defendants to the extent' of the unpaid balance on their stock.

At the commencement of the trial defendants demanded a jury trial. This demand was denied, and the court proceeded to try the case as a court case. The ruling on this question is assigned as error, and presents the first…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Parmelee v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. County of Morgan v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Dilzell Engineering & Construction Co. v. LehmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gray Construction Co. v. FantleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Citizen's Bank v. WillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gray Construction Co. v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API