Legal Opinion

McDaniels v. Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1999No. 98-CV-434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Yolanda McDaniels appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion to set aside a judgment based on an arbitration award. She contends that her counsel did not receive timely notice of the award and was therefore precluded from filing a timely request for a trial de novo. We affirm.

I

THE FACTS 1

On May 23, 1997, plaintiffs Linda Brown and Jeannette Harris filed suit against Ms. McDaniels in the Superior Court, alleging personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. The case was referred for non-binding arbitration pursuant to the Superior Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Frain v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Carroll v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Toomey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. J.C. & Associates v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Brown v. Kone, Inc. 2020K L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Chatterjee v. Mid Atlantic Regional Council of CarpentersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Brown v. Kone, Inc. 2020K L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF FRANKE v. FrankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API