Legal Opinion

JFB Hart Coatings, Inc. v. AM GENERAL LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 8, 2011No. 09 C 7466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are serious allegations that a party to this action has sought to distort the discovery and trial process through conduct that merits sanctions. AM General LLC (“AM General” or “Defendant”) has filed a motion for default judgment against JFB Hart Coatings, Inc. (“JFB Hart” or “Plaintiff’), asking the Court to dismiss this case with prejudice because JFB Hart has engaged in misconduct including document fabrication, perjury, and failure to produce important documents in a timely manner. (R. 40, Def.’s Mot.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. ABF Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laukus v. Rio Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. ChampionsWorld, LLC v. United States Soccer FederationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Asia Pacific Telecom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. Patrick v. ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. United States v. Z Investment Properties LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API