Rischeck v. Lowden
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Plaintiff was injured when the small truck which he was driving was struck by one of defendants’ trains. He recovered judgment for $9000 for the primary negligence of defendants in failing to warn of the train’s approach.
The chief question for decision is whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law so as to preclude any recovery on his part. It has become axiomatic, in determining this question, that the evidence for plaintiff must be accepted as true and plaintiff must be allowed tbe benefit of every reasonable' inference in Ms favor that may be drawn from all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelsay v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Hayden v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Monroe v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Carner v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borrson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Zumault v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Pipes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Fugate v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Short v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.