Legal Opinion

LaBranche v. American Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1953No. 34723PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

While it is true, as argued by able counsel for the claimant, that opinion testimony is entitled only to weight when considered with probability and reason, in the instant case two qualified physicians testified that the causative factor involved in the bleeding of an ulcer is erosion, or the natural result of a progressively maturing ulcer. This carries the instant case out of the domain of probability, and into the realm of fact and reality. To our minds the testimony of the physicians was not based on speculation and/or conjecture, but on testimony of qualified experts. Evidence from this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Williams v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Brown v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Duncan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Truelove v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Truelove v. HuletteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API