Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burnett v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 2015No. 32177-1-IIIPublished

1Dissent

Brown, A.C.J.

¶58 (dissenting) Today, we fail to answer Virginia Burnett’s sole assignment of error: whether the trial court erred in summarily dismissing her negligence claim against the Department of Corrections (DOC) under the “same employ” provision of RCW 51.24-.030(1). Ms. Burnett contends, and I agree, the prison guard who caused her injuries and she were not in the “same employ” and, therefore, the trial court erred. I would reach the merits and reverse, not dismiss. After all, Ms. Burnett had little or no choice in assigning her claim against DOC to the Department of Labor and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Teter v. DeckWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kitsap County Prosecuting Attorney's Guild v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. PROSECUTING ATTY'S GUILD v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API