Legal Opinion

Fleetwood v. Bibb

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 25, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Candler. Thomas superior court. December 10, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. There was in the present case no error in striking the exceptions: to the auditor’s report on the ground that they were “notsufficiently specific to raise any question that could be properly referred to a jury or determined by the court.” See Mason v. Commissioners, 104 Ga. 35 (3).

2. Even if exceptions of the character above referred to are amendable, an application to allow amendments to the same is addressed to the sound discretion of the court; and as there does not appear to have been any good reason or excuse for not presenting the exceptions in proper form within due time, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mason v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Ridgeway v. Downing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Littleton v. Patton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moss v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Tippin v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Mitchell v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Collins v. Lyon, Lyon & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API