Daniel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Michael Daniel was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and was given two ten-year concurrent sentences.
The single issue on appeal relates to prosecutorial misconduct and whether the conduct was so prejudicial to the appellant that state law requires that he be given a new trial. We conclude that the law requires that a new trial be granted in this case.
The following occurred during and after cross-examination of the appellant:
"Q: Do you know Willie Frank Parker?
"A: Yes, I do.
"Q: Isn't it a fact — let me ask you this first of all: isn't it a fact that you got Willie…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Wysinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- United States v. Fred T. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Aloyisus M. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Covington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte LaakkonenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte LaakkonenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Laakkonen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008