Legal Opinion

Daniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael Daniel was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and was given two ten-year concurrent sentences.

The single issue on appeal relates to prosecutorial misconduct and whether the conduct was so prejudicial to the appellant that state law requires that he be given a new trial. We conclude that the law requires that a new trial be granted in this case.

The following occurred during and after cross-examination of the appellant:

"Q: Do you know Willie Frank Parker?
"A: Yes, I do.
"Q: Isn't it a fact — let me ask you this first of all: isn't it a fact that you got Willie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Wysinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. United States v. Fred T. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Aloyisus M. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Covington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte LaakkonenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Ex Parte LaakkonenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Laakkonen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API