Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Laakkonen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 24, 2009No. 1080650Published

1Opinion of the Court

21 So.3d 1271 (2009)

Ex parte Laren Edward LAAKKONEN

(In re Laren Edward Laakkonen v. State of Alabama).

1080650.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 24, 2009.

Jake Watson of Watson Graffeo, P.C., Huntsville, for petitioner.

Submitted on petitioner's brief only.

Prior report: Ala.Crim.App., ___ So.3d ___.

LYONS, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. United States v. Aloyisus M. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Covington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte PeaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API